Discussion:
SCOUT LADY"S stunning admission - she prefers fascism
(too old to reply)
PharLap
2004-10-14 05:36:13 UTC
Permalink
I am actually quite stunned by Scout Lady's admission here in the last
line of this exchange - but first please read it.

Her actual words are "You ought to know by now that I support fascism over
socialism any day"

+++++++++++++++
Thinking about it I have come to amusing conclusion that when a
conservative
Christian makes a stand that it automatically means that the government
is
making that stand.
Does this mean that like the rest of the world you have recognised that
the current Administration seeks to be a Fascist theocracy?
You ought to know by now that I support fascism over socialism any day.
+++++++

Why is this such a serious matter? - well maybe we should see how our
forefathers saw the issue.

In Britain at the outbreak of the Second World War socialists in the
British Parliament and in the extra parliamentary membership of the Labour
Party all agreed to support a national government to conduct war agains
Nazi Germany, a fascist state.

It was as a direct result of this support that working class persons were
successfully encouraged to volunteer for the armed forces opposing Adolf
Hitler and allowed themselves to be conscripted. This then was the force
that opposed Hitler. Britain itself stood alone for some two years until
the Pearl Harbour bombing shocked America into an understanding of reality
- one wonders what it would take now, for even the vile incident of the
twin towers has failed to knock sense into some very silly heads over
there. (In fact one should remind you that the British Governemnt that
supports America in Iraq IS a Labour Government formed from a social
democratic and partially socialist party!)

In the years prior to 1939 almost the only opponents - with the exception
of the arch conservative Churchill - of fascism and its extremist form of
Nazism, were the socialists and communists. Had the line been held in
Republican Spain, it is very possible the war would never have taken
place.

Back in England my own parents lived close to one of the markets where
there were frequent street fights between socialists and fascists. It was
the socialists that rid Britain of the Fascist and Nazi menace in its
midst. Conservatism might well have smiled approvingly on the foundation
of a British Fascist state allied to Hitler for the British Fascist leader
- Moseley - was a former Conservative Member of Parliament, and there were
many Nazi sympathisers in the British Upper Class and his former party.

The most terrifying losses in the Second World War were in the communist
State of the Soviet Union - it took the sacrifice there of up to what is
now admitted to be around fifty million people, to stem the tide and to
start the defeat of Hitler. Most were socialists

Hitler's Fascism was halted at Stalingrad in the Soviet Union and at El
Alamein in north Africa. Had it not been for the working class kids in
Montgomerys eighth Army the tide might never have turned.

Americas allies in the Second World War were predominantly based firmly in
socialism at a grass roots level. As far as the conservative forces were
concerned, from Governments to the Vatican they collapsed one after
another and succumbed - often willingly - to the power of the jackboot.
The resistance of many countries and areas had a core of socialists and
social democrats - many, many, died. You insult their memory and through
them that of your forefathers who fought as allies.

Amongst the Eoropean Protestant churches, one after another caved in to
the Nazis, the German Protestants even allowing themselves to be organised
into a Germanic, pro Nazi Church. Priests like Bonhoeffer who stood
against the Nazis were a rarity indeed. Yes there were individuals of a
level of bravery that resulted in their even being listed amongst the
Righteous of the Nations, but sadly these were all too often exceptions

When you say you prefer Fascism to socialism, you insult those who fought
alongside American GIs in the war, and often in battles and wars since.
Western Europe as a continent with a far different political structure
and culture to backward right wing America has long had large numbers of
socialists and Labour Party and social democratic voting persons in its
armies. These armies, through the NATO alliance, defended Western Europe
against any threat of being over-run by Stalinist/Communist forces
alongside Americans.

But I am afraid as Kennedy said to Americans , to really understand the
situation one had to come to Berlin. There one saw the reality of the
Cold War.

If you prefer Fascism to Socialism then indeed you prefer the fascistic
heirarchys of Fundamentalism. This places you firmly on the side of the
structures that produce the likes of Al Queda and Saddam Hussein. You
support the political structures led by such as the Ayatollah Khomeini

As so often you demonstrate, all too often the enemies Americans should
most fear are themselves. It has all happened before - on the other side
of the Atlantic.

In a private conversation in November 1936 Cardinal Faulhaber of Munich
and Hitler spoke together for some three hours. The Cardinal himself
recorded Hitlers words and observed:

"The Fuehrer commands the diplomatic and social forms better than a born
sovereign... Without doubt the Chancellor lives in faith in God. He
recognises Christianity as the foundation of Western culture... Not as
clear is his conception of the Catholic Church as a God-established
institution"

Following their meeting Faulhaber issued an episcopal letter to be read in
Churches throughout Bavaria calling for co-operation between Church and
state "in combating communism" provided at the same time there was respect
for the Churches Rights as laid down in the Concordat.

Catholicism has a lot to answer for, for the definition of communism by
the Right Wing neo fascist Vatican and its Fascist leaning papacy and
Curia included many we would regard rather as socialists than communists

The Vatican came closer to its senses as the war itself came closer - but
much damage had been done, the opposition to Hitler and to Fascism had
been weakened in Central Europe as it had been in Spain

The true traitors in Western Society my dear, the ones who both invoke
terrorism and weaken the ability to fight it, are such as you, not "the
socialists" as you would have it

Think again. Our friends will continue to bleed , suffer and die until
you and your ilk come to their senses.



+++++++++++++++++++++

+++++++++++++++++
PharLap
2004-10-14 05:52:11 UTC
Permalink
FLOSSENBURG PRISON April 9, 1945.

The controversial theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, along with other members
of the Admiral Canaris resistance group, was executed here by hanging.

Bonhoeffer went calmly to his death. As he was led out of his cell, he was
observed by the prison doctor who said: "Through the half-open door I saw
Pastor Bonhoeffer still in his prison clothes, kneeling in fervent prayer
to the Lord his God. The devotion and evident conviction of being heard
that I saw in the prayer of this intensely captivating man moved me to the
depths."

The prisoners were ordered to strip. Naked under the scaffold, Bonhoeffer
knelt for one last time to pray. Five minutes later, he was dead.

Bonhoeffer was condemned for his involvement in "Operation 7," a rescue
mission that had helped a small group of Jews over the German border and
into Switzerland. The 39-year-old theologian had also been involved in
planning an unsuccessful assassination attempt on the life of Adolf
Hitler. His participation in the murder plot obviously conflicts with
Bonhoeffer's position as a pacifist. His sister-in-law, Emmi Bonhoeffer,
cited his reasoning.

He told her:
"If I see a madman driving a car into a group of innocent bystanders, then
I can't, as a Christian, simply wait for the catastrophe and then comfort
the wounded and bury the dead. I must try to wrestle the steering wheel
out of the hands of the driver."

Interestingly, Bonhoeffer had safely escaped the troubles in Europe and
gone to teach in New York in June, 1939. He abruptly returned less than a
month later saying: "I have had time to think and to pray about my
situation, and that of my nation, and to have God's will for me clarified.
I have come to the conclusion that I have made a mistake in coming to
America. I shall have no right to participate in the reconstruction of the
Christian life in Germany after the war if I did not share in the trials
of this time with my people. Christians in Germany face the terrible
alternative of willing the defeat of their nation in order that
civilization may survive, or willing the victory of their nation and
thereby destroying civilization. I know which of these alternatives I must
choose. But I cannot make that choice in security."

Bonhoeffer, even while in prison, maintained his pastoral role. Those who
were with him spoke of the guidance and spiritual inspiration he gave not
only to fellow inmates but to prison guards as well.

In a letter smuggled out of prison Bonhoeffer showed no bitterness but
rather explained how, "We in the resistance have learned to see the great
events of world history from below, from the perspective of the excluded,
the ill treated, the powerless, the oppressed and despised... so that
personal suffering has become a more useful key for understanding the
world than personal happiness."

POSTSCRIPT: In the same month that Bonhoeffer was hanged, on April 30,
1945, Hitler committed suicide. Seven days later Germany surrendered.

Bonhoeffer Chronology


Feb. 4, 1906--Dietrich and twin sister Sabine born in Breslau, Germany

Aug. 1, 1931--Becomes lecturer in Theology at the University of Berlin

Apr. 26, 1935--Establishes underground seminary for the Confessing Church
at Zingst, which in June moves to Finkenwalde

Aug. 5, 1936--Forbidden to lecture at the University of Berlin

1937--Finkenwalde Seminary closed by Gestapo; 27 former Finkenwalde
students imprisoned; Dietrich publishes Cost of Discipleship

Feb. 1938--Makes first contact with conspirators in connection with
political resistance against Hitler

Jun. 2, 1939--Leaves for New York City

Jul. 27, 1939--Returns to Germany and joins the political resistance

Mar. 27, 1941--Forbidden to print or publish

Sep. 1941--Becomes part of Jewish rescue action (Operation 7)

Jan. 1943--At age 36 engaged to Maria von Wedemeyer

Apr. 5, 1943--At age 37 arrested and taken to Tegel Prison, Berlin;
Dohnanyi and Dietrich's sister, Christine, also arrested

Feb. 7, 1945--Moved to the Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Apr. 1945--Discovery of Admiral Canaris' diary; Hitler orders annihilation
of the Canaris group which includes Bonhoeffer

Apr. 9, 1945 Bonhoeffer (age 39) hanged at Flossenburg; Dohnanyi killed at
the Sachsenhausen Camp
PharLap
2004-10-17 22:44:43 UTC
Permalink
FLOSSENBURG PRISON April 9, 1945.

The controversial theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, along with other members
of the Admiral Canaris resistance group, was executed here by hanging.

Bonhoeffer went calmly to his death. As he was led out of his cell, he was
observed by the prison doctor who said: "Through the half-open door I saw
Pastor Bonhoeffer still in his prison clothes, kneeling in fervent prayer
to the Lord his God. The devotion and evident conviction of being heard
that I saw in the prayer of this intensely captivating man moved me to the
depths."

The prisoners were ordered to strip. Naked under the scaffold, Bonhoeffer
knelt for one last time to pray. Five minutes later, he was dead.

Bonhoeffer was condemned for his involvement in "Operation 7," a rescue
mission that had helped a small group of Jews over the German border and
into Switzerland. The 39-year-old theologian had also been involved in
planning an unsuccessful assassination attempt on the life of Adolf
Hitler. His participation in the murder plot obviously conflicts with
Bonhoeffer's position as a pacifist. His sister-in-law, Emmi Bonhoeffer,
cited his reasoning.

He told her:
"If I see a madman driving a car into a group of innocent bystanders, then
I can't, as a Christian, simply wait for the catastrophe and then comfort
the wounded and bury the dead. I must try to wrestle the steering wheel
out of the hands of the driver."

Interestingly, Bonhoeffer had safely escaped the troubles in Europe and
gone to teach in New York in June, 1939. He abruptly returned less than a
month later saying: "I have had time to think and to pray about my
situation, and that of my nation, and to have God's will for me clarified.
I have come to the conclusion that I have made a mistake in coming to
America. I shall have no right to participate in the reconstruction of the
Christian life in Germany after the war if I did not share in the trials
of this time with my people. Christians in Germany face the terrible
alternative of willing the defeat of their nation in order that
civilization may survive, or willing the victory of their nation and
thereby destroying civilization. I know which of these alternatives I must
choose. But I cannot make that choice in security."

Bonhoeffer, even while in prison, maintained his pastoral role. Those who
were with him spoke of the guidance and spiritual inspiration he gave not
only to fellow inmates but to prison guards as well.

In a letter smuggled out of prison Bonhoeffer showed no bitterness but
rather explained how, "We in the resistance have learned to see the great
events of world history from below, from the perspective of the excluded,
the ill treated, the powerless, the oppressed and despised... so that
personal suffering has become a more useful key for understanding the
world than personal happiness."

POSTSCRIPT: In the same month that Bonhoeffer was hanged, on April 30,
1945, Hitler committed suicide. Seven days later Germany surrendered.

Bonhoeffer Chronology


Feb. 4, 1906--Dietrich and twin sister Sabine born in Breslau, Germany

Aug. 1, 1931--Becomes lecturer in Theology at the University of Berlin

Apr. 26, 1935--Establishes underground seminary for the Confessing Church
at Zingst, which in June moves to Finkenwalde

Aug. 5, 1936--Forbidden to lecture at the University of Berlin

1937--Finkenwalde Seminary closed by Gestapo; 27 former Finkenwalde
students imprisoned; Dietrich publishes Cost of Discipleship

Feb. 1938--Makes first contact with conspirators in connection with
political resistance against Hitler

Jun. 2, 1939--Leaves for New York City

Jul. 27, 1939--Returns to Germany and joins the political resistance

Mar. 27, 1941--Forbidden to print or publish

Sep. 1941--Becomes part of Jewish rescue action (Operation 7)

Jan. 1943--At age 36 engaged to Maria von Wedemeyer

Apr. 5, 1943--At age 37 arrested and taken to Tegel Prison, Berlin;
Dohnanyi and Dietrich's sister, Christine, also arrested

Feb. 7, 1945--Moved to the Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Apr. 1945--Discovery of Admiral Canaris' diary; Hitler orders annihilation
of the Canaris group which includes Bonhoeffer

Apr. 9, 1945 Bonhoeffer (age 39) hanged at Flossenburg; Dohnanyi killed at
the Sachsenhausen Camp
PharLap
2004-10-14 05:53:43 UTC
Permalink
Hitler became chancellor in Germany on January 30, 1933.

His government's first official act against the Jews was a one-day boycott
of Jewish businesses on April 1, 1933. Pickets were placed in front of
factories, stores and shops belonging to Jews.

Dietrich's grandmother, Julie Bonhoeffer, boldly walked through a group of
SS men into a Jewish department store and made a purchase. Marion Lehmann,
an American friend of the family who visited them in Berlin at the time
said, "(Julie) said she was not going to be told that she couldn't go
inside because the owner was Jewish, so she walked right in and bought the
strawberries...

They didn't dare take this elderly woman. She was very alert and walked
elegantly. So nobody was going to stop her!"
PharLap
2004-10-14 06:15:16 UTC
Permalink
Reasons Nazism is not considered socialist


* Throughout its rise to power and rule, the Nazis were strongly opposed
by left-wing and socialist parties, and Nazi rhetoric was virulently
anti-Marxist, attacking both communists and social democrats.

* Nazis proposed that only people who were considered "racially pure" or
Aryan would benefit from their policies. This is contrary to the socialist
notion of a society for the benefit of all.

* In his rise to power, Hitler reassured German industrialists that he
would respect private property and fight labor unions.

* Hitler received strong support from the conservatives for the "Enabling
Act." This legislation was opposed by left wing social democrats.

* After coming to power, Hitler sent thousand of communists, social
democrats and unionists to concentration camps and killed the communist
leaders in Germany. He outlawed labor unions and guaranteed corporate
profits for Krupp & Co.

* The profits of large corporations soared under the Nazis.

* Ultimately, Hitler was interested in absolute power and is thus
correctly classified a fascist.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++
voj
2004-10-14 09:30:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by PharLap
Reasons Nazism is not considered socialist
Number one
Total ignorance, especially by Socialists.
PharLap
2004-10-17 22:45:46 UTC
Permalink
Reasons Nazism is not considered socialist


* Throughout its rise to power and rule, the Nazis were strongly opposed
by left-wing and socialist parties, and Nazi rhetoric was virulently
anti-Marxist, attacking both communists and social democrats.

* Nazis proposed that only people who were considered "racially pure" or
Aryan would benefit from their policies. This is contrary to the socialist
notion of a society for the benefit of all.

* In his rise to power, Hitler reassured German industrialists that he
would respect private property and fight labor unions.

* Hitler received strong support from the conservatives for the "Enabling
Act." This legislation was opposed by left wing social democrats.

* After coming to power, Hitler sent thousand of communists, social
democrats and unionists to concentration camps and killed the communist
leaders in Germany. He outlawed labor unions and guaranteed corporate
profits for Krupp & Co.

* The profits of large corporations soared under the Nazis.

* Ultimately, Hitler was interested in absolute power and is thus
correctly classified a fascist.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++
voj
2004-10-18 02:04:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by PharLap
Reasons Nazism is not considered socialist
Socialism = the government controls all
Socialism = there results one leader.
Fascism = The leader IS the government.

Socialism = Fascism = Communism = Liberalism

Get an education and forget your cute little names of like / dislike.

You are so full of crap about large corps profits soaring it is ridiculous.

By crap, I mean plain everyday shit. You have diarrhea of the mouth.

Socialism = the government controls all
Socialism = there results one leader.
Fascism = The leader IS the government.

Fascism is control. It is not about being nice or not nice, agreeable or
not agreeable.

Fascism can ONLY exist in a Socialistic environment.
PharLap
2004-10-20 12:11:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by voj
Post by PharLap
Reasons Nazism is not considered socialist
Socialism = the government controls all
Socialism = there results one leader.
Fascism = The leader IS the government.
Socialism = Fascism = Communism = Liberalism
Get an education and forget your cute little names of like / dislike.
You are so full of crap about large corps profits soaring it is ridiculous.
By crap, I mean plain everyday shit. You have diarrhea of the mouth.
Socialism = the government controls all
Socialism = there results one leader.
Fascism = The leader IS the government.
Fascism is control. It is not about being nice or not nice, agreeable or
not agreeable.
Fascism can ONLY exist in a Socialistic environment.
Your ignorance never ceases to astound me
PharLap
2004-10-14 06:18:36 UTC
Permalink
Totalitarianism

Totalitarianism is any political system in which a citizen is totally
subject to state authority in all aspects of day-to-day life. It goes well
beyond dictatorship or typical police state measures, and even beyond
those measures required to sustain total war with other states. It
involves constant brainwashing achieved by propaganda to erase any
potential for dissent, by anyone, including most especially the state's
agents.

The term was originally coined by Benito Mussolini to describe his regime
in Italy, although it is arguable that Italian fascism was not truly
totalitarian until 1940. It was popularized by Hannah Arendt in order to
illustrate the commonalities between Nazism and Stalinism as theories of
civics. It has also been used to include all fascist and communist regimes
‹ though some fascist regimes, such as Franco's Spain, and Mussolini's
Italy before World War II, and some communist regimes, such as Yugoslavia
under Tito and the People's Republic of China under Deng Xiaoping, could
be characterized as more authoritarian than totalitarian.


Totalitarian regimes


Totalitarian regimes have generally been far rarer than authoritarian
ones. There is no theory of ethics that holds that they are desirable.

Joseph Stalin's Soviet Union and Adolf Hitler's Germany are widely
considered to be the two quintessential examples of totalitarian regimes
in history. Both held power for long periods despite substantial pressure.

The Khmer Rouge under Pol Pot are widely considered to be the very worst
government in human history - that regime transcends all concept of even
totalitarian definitions in terms of the sheer horror it unleashed on the
citizens of Cambodia. It is certainly totalitarian, but also genocidal -
even self-consuming. It eventually collapsed completely.

A contemporary example often cited, e.g. in George W. Bush's Axis of Evil,
is North Korea; certain Islamist regimes, such as that found in Iran, are
also sometimes described as totalitarian. In fiction, the Big Brother
regime described in George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four is
considered to be a quintessential example of totalitarianism.

Most political scientists believe totalitarian regimes were rare before
the 20th century because neither technological means nor ideological
justifications existed for controlling large numbers of people. The Qin
Dynasty is perhaps a rare example of a possible pre-modern totalitarian
state.

Today, however, television, radio, and other mass media make it relatively
easy for totalitarian regimes to make their presence felt, often through
campaigns of propaganda or the creation of a vast personality cult.

The terms totalitarian democracy and totalitarian republic have also been
used to classify a different style of totalitarian rule. In these regimes,
the government is generally popular (at least at the beginning), and the
ideological justification of the state comes on behalf of the people.
Hitler's initially-democratically-elected regime of Nazi totalitarianism
is often used as an example of a totalitarian democracy.


Theories of totalitarianism

The relationship between totalitarianism and authoritarianism is
controversial: some see totalitarianism as an extreme form of
authoritarianism, while others argue that they are completely different.

Some political analysts, notably neo-conservatives such as Jeane
Kirkpatrick, have studied the various distinctions between totalitarianism
and authoritarianism. They argue that while both types of governments can
be extremely brutal to political opponents, in an authoritarian government
the government's efforts are directed mostly at those who are considered
political opponents, and the government has neither the will or often the
means to control every aspect of an individual's life. In a totalitarian
system, the ruling ideology requires that every aspect of an individual's
life be subordinate to the state, including occupation, income, and
religion. Personal survival is tied to the regime's survival, and thus the
concept of the state and the people are merged. This is also called the
carceral state - like a prison.

In political theories such as libertarianism, totalitarianism is regarded
as the most extreme form of statism. However, other political philosophers
disagree with this analysis as it implies that totalitarianism can come
into being through a slow and gradual increase from an operational
government, while totalitarian regimes almost uniformly come into being as
a result of a revolution which replaces what is generally regarded as an
ineffective government.

It has been argued that totalitarianism requires a cult of personality
around a charismatic "great leader" who is glorified as the legitimator of
the regime. Many totalitarian societies fit this model - for example,
those of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, Pol Pot, and Kim Il-Sung. This is
one of the reasons some scholars were reluctant to consider the
Brezhnev-era Soviet Union and most of the Warsaw Pact nations
totalitarian. When those governments fell, however, the majority of the
populations and intellectuals of the countries argued that what they had
experienced was indeed totalitarianism. This has made more popular the
belief that a charismatic leader is a frequent but not a necessary
characteristic of totalitarianism.

Michael Ledeen has advanced the theory that the role of the United States
should be to impose by war the institutions it associates with democracy -
waging what he calls total war to eradicate the prior society. This would
imply at least a brief period of totalitarian style control in order to
erase that society, and teach the next generation the democratic civics.

+++++++++++++++++++
voj
2004-10-14 09:31:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by PharLap
Totalitarianism
Totalitarianism
The "state" has control.

There is always in a Socialist / NAZI state, a head.
PharLap
2004-10-17 22:46:22 UTC
Permalink
Totalitarianism

Totalitarianism is any political system in which a citizen is totally
subject to state authority in all aspects of day-to-day life. It goes well
beyond dictatorship or typical police state measures, and even beyond
those measures required to sustain total war with other states. It
involves constant brainwashing achieved by propaganda to erase any
potential for dissent, by anyone, including most especially the state's
agents.

The term was originally coined by Benito Mussolini to describe his regime
in Italy, although it is arguable that Italian fascism was not truly
totalitarian until 1940. It was popularized by Hannah Arendt in order to
illustrate the commonalities between Nazism and Stalinism as theories of
civics. It has also been used to include all fascist and communist regimes
‹ though some fascist regimes, such as Franco's Spain, and Mussolini's
Italy before World War II, and some communist regimes, such as Yugoslavia
under Tito and the People's Republic of China under Deng Xiaoping, could
be characterized as more authoritarian than totalitarian.


Totalitarian regimes


Totalitarian regimes have generally been far rarer than authoritarian
ones. There is no theory of ethics that holds that they are desirable.

Joseph Stalin's Soviet Union and Adolf Hitler's Germany are widely
considered to be the two quintessential examples of totalitarian regimes
in history. Both held power for long periods despite substantial pressure.

The Khmer Rouge under Pol Pot are widely considered to be the very worst
government in human history - that regime transcends all concept of even
totalitarian definitions in terms of the sheer horror it unleashed on the
citizens of Cambodia. It is certainly totalitarian, but also genocidal -
even self-consuming. It eventually collapsed completely.

A contemporary example often cited, e.g. in George W. Bush's Axis of Evil,
is North Korea; certain Islamist regimes, such as that found in Iran, are
also sometimes described as totalitarian. In fiction, the Big Brother
regime described in George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four is
considered to be a quintessential example of totalitarianism.

Most political scientists believe totalitarian regimes were rare before
the 20th century because neither technological means nor ideological
justifications existed for controlling large numbers of people. The Qin
Dynasty is perhaps a rare example of a possible pre-modern totalitarian
state.

Today, however, television, radio, and other mass media make it relatively
easy for totalitarian regimes to make their presence felt, often through
campaigns of propaganda or the creation of a vast personality cult.

The terms totalitarian democracy and totalitarian republic have also been
used to classify a different style of totalitarian rule. In these regimes,
the government is generally popular (at least at the beginning), and the
ideological justification of the state comes on behalf of the people.
Hitler's initially-democratically-elected regime of Nazi totalitarianism
is often used as an example of a totalitarian democracy.


Theories of totalitarianism

The relationship between totalitarianism and authoritarianism is
controversial: some see totalitarianism as an extreme form of
authoritarianism, while others argue that they are completely different.

Some political analysts, notably neo-conservatives such as Jeane
Kirkpatrick, have studied the various distinctions between totalitarianism
and authoritarianism. They argue that while both types of governments can
be extremely brutal to political opponents, in an authoritarian government
the government's efforts are directed mostly at those who are considered
political opponents, and the government has neither the will or often the
means to control every aspect of an individual's life. In a totalitarian
system, the ruling ideology requires that every aspect of an individual's
life be subordinate to the state, including occupation, income, and
religion. Personal survival is tied to the regime's survival, and thus the
concept of the state and the people are merged. This is also called the
carceral state - like a prison.

In political theories such as libertarianism, totalitarianism is regarded
as the most extreme form of statism. However, other political philosophers
disagree with this analysis as it implies that totalitarianism can come
into being through a slow and gradual increase from an operational
government, while totalitarian regimes almost uniformly come into being as
a result of a revolution which replaces what is generally regarded as an
ineffective government.

It has been argued that totalitarianism requires a cult of personality
around a charismatic "great leader" who is glorified as the legitimator of
the regime. Many totalitarian societies fit this model - for example,
those of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, Pol Pot, and Kim Il-Sung. This is
one of the reasons some scholars were reluctant to consider the
Brezhnev-era Soviet Union and most of the Warsaw Pact nations
totalitarian. When those governments fell, however, the majority of the
populations and intellectuals of the countries argued that what they had
experienced was indeed totalitarianism. This has made more popular the
belief that a charismatic leader is a frequent but not a necessary
characteristic of totalitarianism.

Michael Ledeen has advanced the theory that the role of the United States
should be to impose by war the institutions it associates with democracy -
waging what he calls total war to eradicate the prior society. This would
imply at least a brief period of totalitarian style control in order to
erase that society, and teach the next generation the democratic civics.

+++++++++++++++++++
voj
2004-10-18 02:05:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by PharLap
Totalitarianism
Totalitarianism is any political system in which a citizen is totally
subject to state authority in all aspects of day-to-day life.
That is the definition of liberalism and Socialism ALSO
PharLap
2004-10-17 22:45:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by PharLap
Hitler became chancellor in Germany on January 30, 1933.
His government's first official act against the Jews was a one-day boycott
of Jewish businesses on April 1, 1933. Pickets were placed in front of
factories, stores and shops belonging to Jews.
Dietrich's grandmother, Julie Bonhoeffer, boldly walked through a group of
SS men into a Jewish department store and made a purchase. Marion Lehmann,
an American friend of the family who visited them in Berlin at the time
said, "(Julie) said she was not going to be told that she couldn't go
inside because the owner was Jewish, so she walked right in and bought the
strawberries...
They didn't dare take this elderly woman. She was very alert and walked
elegantly. So nobody was going to stop her!"
3
Scout Lady
2004-10-14 11:53:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by PharLap
I am actually quite stunned by Scout Lady's admission here in the last
line of this exchange - but first please read it.
Her actual words are "You ought to know by now that I support fascism over
socialism any day"
+++++++++++++++
LOL
Post by PharLap
Thinking about it I have come to amusing conclusion that when a
conservative
Christian makes a stand that it automatically means that the government
is
making that stand.
Does this mean that like the rest of the world you have recognised that
the current Administration seeks to be a Fascist theocracy?
You ought to know by now that I support fascism over socialism any day.
+++++++
Why is this such a serious matter? - well maybe we should see how our
forefathers saw the issue.
In Britain at the outbreak of the Second World War socialists in the
British Parliament and in the extra parliamentary membership of the Labour
Party all agreed to support a national government to conduct war agains
Nazi Germany, a fascist state.
It was as a direct result of this support that working class persons were
successfully encouraged to volunteer for the armed forces opposing Adolf
Hitler and allowed themselves to be conscripted. This then was the force
that opposed Hitler. Britain itself stood alone for some two years until
the Pearl Harbour bombing shocked America into an understanding of reality
- one wonders what it would take now, for even the vile incident of the
twin towers has failed to knock sense into some very silly heads over
there. (In fact one should remind you that the British Governemnt that
supports America in Iraq IS a Labour Government formed from a social
democratic and partially socialist party!)
In the years prior to 1939 almost the only opponents - with the exception
of the arch conservative Churchill - of fascism and its extremist form of
Nazism, were the socialists and communists. Had the line been held in
Republican Spain, it is very possible the war would never have taken
place.
Back in England my own parents lived close to one of the markets where
there were frequent street fights between socialists and fascists. It was
the socialists that rid Britain of the Fascist and Nazi menace in its
midst. Conservatism might well have smiled approvingly on the foundation
of a British Fascist state allied to Hitler for the British Fascist leader
- Moseley - was a former Conservative Member of Parliament, and there were
many Nazi sympathisers in the British Upper Class and his former party.
The most terrifying losses in the Second World War were in the communist
State of the Soviet Union - it took the sacrifice there of up to what is
now admitted to be around fifty million people, to stem the tide and to
start the defeat of Hitler. Most were socialists
Hitler's Fascism was halted at Stalingrad in the Soviet Union and at El
Alamein in north Africa. Had it not been for the working class kids in
Montgomerys eighth Army the tide might never have turned.
Americas allies in the Second World War were predominantly based firmly in
socialism at a grass roots level. As far as the conservative forces were
concerned, from Governments to the Vatican they collapsed one after
another and succumbed - often willingly - to the power of the jackboot.
The resistance of many countries and areas had a core of socialists and
social democrats - many, many, died. You insult their memory and through
them that of your forefathers who fought as allies.
Amongst the Eoropean Protestant churches, one after another caved in to
the Nazis, the German Protestants even allowing themselves to be organised
into a Germanic, pro Nazi Church. Priests like Bonhoeffer who stood
against the Nazis were a rarity indeed. Yes there were individuals of a
level of bravery that resulted in their even being listed amongst the
Righteous of the Nations, but sadly these were all too often exceptions
When you say you prefer Fascism to socialism, you insult those who fought
alongside American GIs in the war, and often in battles and wars since.
Western Europe as a continent with a far different political structure
and culture to backward right wing America has long had large numbers of
socialists and Labour Party and social democratic voting persons in its
armies. These armies, through the NATO alliance, defended Western Europe
against any threat of being over-run by Stalinist/Communist forces
alongside Americans.
But I am afraid as Kennedy said to Americans , to really understand the
situation one had to come to Berlin. There one saw the reality of the
Cold War.
If you prefer Fascism to Socialism then indeed you prefer the fascistic
heirarchys of Fundamentalism. This places you firmly on the side of the
structures that produce the likes of Al Queda and Saddam Hussein. You
support the political structures led by such as the Ayatollah Khomeini
As so often you demonstrate, all too often the enemies Americans should
most fear are themselves. It has all happened before - on the other side
of the Atlantic.
In a private conversation in November 1936 Cardinal Faulhaber of Munich
and Hitler spoke together for some three hours. The Cardinal himself
"The Fuehrer commands the diplomatic and social forms better than a born
sovereign... Without doubt the Chancellor lives in faith in God. He
recognises Christianity as the foundation of Western culture... Not as
clear is his conception of the Catholic Church as a God-established
institution"
Following their meeting Faulhaber issued an episcopal letter to be read in
Churches throughout Bavaria calling for co-operation between Church and
state "in combating communism" provided at the same time there was respect
for the Churches Rights as laid down in the Concordat.
Catholicism has a lot to answer for, for the definition of communism by
the Right Wing neo fascist Vatican and its Fascist leaning papacy and
Curia included many we would regard rather as socialists than communists
The Vatican came closer to its senses as the war itself came closer - but
much damage had been done, the opposition to Hitler and to Fascism had
been weakened in Central Europe as it had been in Spain
The true traitors in Western Society my dear, the ones who both invoke
terrorism and weaken the ability to fight it, are such as you, not "the
socialists" as you would have it
Think again. Our friends will continue to bleed , suffer and die until
you and your ilk come to their senses.
+++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++
r***@romath.net
2004-10-14 16:38:59 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:36:13 +1100, ***@mystable.com (PharLap)
done went and wrote as Gospel Truth in these here little old Usenet
Post by PharLap
I am actually quite stunned by Scout Lady's admission here in the last
line of this exchange - but first please read it.
Her actual words are "You ought to know by now that I support fascism over
socialism any day"
Nothing that dame claims would surprise me, PHar... absolutely
nothing.

-------------------------------------------------------
JESUS IS THE ROCK
God doesn't call the qualified; He qualifies the called
-------------------------------------------------------
Scout Lady
2004-10-14 16:52:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by r***@romath.net
done went and wrote as Gospel Truth in these here little old Usenet
Post by PharLap
I am actually quite stunned by Scout Lady's admission here in the last
line of this exchange - but first please read it.
Her actual words are "You ought to know by now that I support fascism over
socialism any day"
Nothing that dame claims would surprise me, PHar... absolutely
nothing.
Of course not, you are as carnal as PL.
Post by r***@romath.net
-------------------------------------------------------
JESUS IS THE ROCK
God doesn't call the qualified; He qualifies the called
-------------------------------------------------------
r***@romath.net
2004-10-15 00:17:35 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:52:53 -0400, "Scout Lady"
Post by Scout Lady
Of course not, you are as carnal as PL.
Strange, madam, but I am single and celibate. So how 'carnal' am I
again dearie?

Admit it, old girl- you only live to argue and falsely accuse.

If it wasn't for the time you WASTE here, you'd have no life at all.
-------------------------------------------------------
JESUS IS THE ROCK
God doesn't call the qualified; He qualifies the called
-------------------------------------------------------
galia
2004-10-15 00:30:09 UTC
Permalink
<***@romath.net> wrote in message news:***@4ax.com...
| On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:52:53 -0400, "Scout Lady"
| <***@nospam.net> done went and wrote as Gospel Truth in these
| here little old Usenet News'FROUPS:
|
| >
| >Of course not, you are as carnal as PL.
|
|
| Strange, madam, but I am single and celibate. So how 'carnal' am I
| again dearie?
|
| Admit it, old girl- you only live to argue and falsely accuse.
|
| If it wasn't for the time you WASTE here, you'd have no life at all.

Have you looked in the mirror lately?

WOW elaine, you got nerves...
| -------------------------------------------------------
| JESUS IS THE ROCK
| God doesn't call the qualified; He qualifies the called
| -------------------------------------------------------
r***@romath.net
2004-10-15 12:43:00 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:30:09 -0400, "galia" <***@somewhere.com> done
went and wrote as Gospel Truth in these here little old Usenet
Post by galia
Have you looked in the mirror lately?
Yes, and for being 56, I still look pretty darn good. Next question?
-------------------------------------------------------
JESUS IS THE ROCK
God doesn't call the qualified; He qualifies the called
-------------------------------------------------------
Scout Lady
2004-10-15 14:03:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by r***@romath.net
went and wrote as Gospel Truth in these here little old Usenet
Post by galia
Have you looked in the mirror lately?
Yes, and for being 56, I still look pretty darn good. Next question?
Yes, compared to what?
Post by r***@romath.net
-------------------------------------------------------
JESUS IS THE ROCK
God doesn't call the qualified; He qualifies the called
-------------------------------------------------------
r***@romath.net
2004-10-15 20:26:51 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:03:31 -0400, "Scout Lady"
Post by Scout Lady
Post by r***@romath.net
went and wrote as Gospel Truth in these here little old Usenet
Post by galia
Have you looked in the mirror lately?
Yes, and for being 56, I still look pretty darn good. Next question?
Yes, compared to what?
Now THAT was a comical one. Very good! :O)
-------------------------------------------------------
JESUS IS THE ROCK
God doesn't call the qualified; He qualifies the called
-------------------------------------------------------
Scout Lady
2004-10-15 02:53:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by r***@romath.net
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:52:53 -0400, "Scout Lady"
Post by Scout Lady
Of course not, you are as carnal as PL.
Strange, madam, but I am single and celibate.
That is strange

Main Entry: cel·i·bate
Pronunciation: 'se-l&-b&t
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin caelibatus, from caelib-, caelebs unmarried
: a person who lives in celibacy

So you are both single and unmarried......that's a new one! Let me help you
out, the words that might have worked better would be chaste, asexual,
frigid, frustrated.

So how 'carnal' am I
Post by r***@romath.net
again dearie?
Admit it, old girl- you only live to argue and falsely accuse.
Actually once again you are falsely accusing because in your ignorance you
only associate the word carnal with sex! As for arguing I was communicating
with PL when you decided to inject and insult so I would say it was you
looking for an argument where you know you would find one. Tsk tsk Elaine,
you got caught again...perhaps you ought to think more and talk less.
Post by r***@romath.net
If it wasn't for the time you WASTE here, you'd have no life at all.
Yes that is why I am not unmarried or childless and why all my family
members are talking to me. How many jobs do you work.........yet in your
free time you are here spreading ill well and crappola. Live a little, go
join one of those Christian dating services.

Allow me to educate you Elaine.

Main Entry: car·nal
Pronunciation: 'kär-n&l
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Old North French or Late Latin; Old North
French, from Late Latin carnalis, from Latin carn-, caro flesh; akin to
Greek keirein to cut -- more at SHEAR
1 a : relating to or given to crude bodily pleasures and appetites b :
marked by sexuality
2 : BODILY, CORPOREAL
3 a : TEMPORAL b : WORLDLY
- car·nal·i·ty /kär-'na-l&-tE/ noun
- car·nal·ly /'kär-n&l-E/ adverb
synonyms CARNAL, FLESHLY, SENSUAL, ANIMAL mean having a relation to the
body. CARNAL may mean only this but more often connotes derogatorily an
action or manifestation of a person's lower nature <a slave to carnal
desires>. FLESHLY is less derogatory than CARNAL <a saint who had
experienced fleshly temptations>. SENSUAL may apply to any gratification of
a bodily desire or pleasure but commonly implies sexual appetite with
absence of the spiritual or intellectual <fleshpots providing sensual
delights>. ANIMAL stresses the physical as distinguished from the rational
nature of a person <led a mindless animal existence>.

The meaning I was going with is 3b but leave it to you to associate the word
solely with sex.

Just so there is no further misunderstanding, I do not think you are a slut
because that would require that men would actually find you sexually
attractive. I do not think you are carnal in a sexual sense because I
suspect that you fear intimacy due to your paranoia and your poor self
image.
PharLap
2004-10-17 22:43:59 UTC
Permalink
I am actually quite stunned by Scout Lady's admission here in the last
line of this exchange - but first please read it.

Her actual words are "You ought to know by now that I support fascism over
socialism any day"

+++++++++++++++
Thinking about it I have come to amusing conclusion that when a
conservative
Christian makes a stand that it automatically means that the government
is
making that stand.
Does this mean that like the rest of the world you have recognised that
the current Administration seeks to be a Fascist theocracy?
You ought to know by now that I support fascism over socialism any day.
+++++++

Why is this such a serious matter? - well maybe we should see how our
forefathers saw the issue.

In Britain at the outbreak of the Second World War socialists in the
British Parliament and in the extra parliamentary membership of the Labour
Party all agreed to support a national government to conduct war agains
Nazi Germany, a fascist state.

It was as a direct result of this support that working class persons were
successfully encouraged to volunteer for the armed forces opposing Adolf
Hitler and allowed themselves to be conscripted. This then was the force
that opposed Hitler. Britain itself stood alone for some two years until
the Pearl Harbour bombing shocked America into an understanding of reality
- one wonders what it would take now, for even the vile incident of the
twin towers has failed to knock sense into some very silly heads over
there. (In fact one should remind you that the British Governemnt that
supports America in Iraq IS a Labour Government formed from a social
democratic and partially socialist party!)

In the years prior to 1939 almost the only opponents - with the exception
of the arch conservative Churchill - of fascism and its extremist form of
Nazism, were the socialists and communists. Had the line been held in
Republican Spain, it is very possible the war would never have taken
place.

Back in England my own parents lived close to one of the markets where
there were frequent street fights between socialists and fascists. It was
the socialists that rid Britain of the Fascist and Nazi menace in its
midst. Conservatism might well have smiled approvingly on the foundation
of a British Fascist state allied to Hitler for the British Fascist leader
- Moseley - was a former Conservative Member of Parliament, and there were
many Nazi sympathisers in the British Upper Class and his former party.

The most terrifying losses in the Second World War were in the communist
State of the Soviet Union - it took the sacrifice there of up to what is
now admitted to be around fifty million people, to stem the tide and to
start the defeat of Hitler. Most were socialists

Hitler's Fascism was halted at Stalingrad in the Soviet Union and at El
Alamein in north Africa. Had it not been for the working class kids in
Montgomerys eighth Army the tide might never have turned.

Americas allies in the Second World War were predominantly based firmly in
socialism at a grass roots level. As far as the conservative forces were
concerned, from Governments to the Vatican they collapsed one after
another and succumbed - often willingly - to the power of the jackboot.
The resistance of many countries and areas had a core of socialists and
social democrats - many, many, died. You insult their memory and through
them that of your forefathers who fought as allies.

Amongst the Eoropean Protestant churches, one after another caved in to
the Nazis, the German Protestants even allowing themselves to be organised
into a Germanic, pro Nazi Church. Priests like Bonhoeffer who stood
against the Nazis were a rarity indeed. Yes there were individuals of a
level of bravery that resulted in their even being listed amongst the
Righteous of the Nations, but sadly these were all too often exceptions

When you say you prefer Fascism to socialism, you insult those who fought
alongside American GIs in the war, and often in battles and wars since.
Western Europe as a continent with a far different political structure
and culture to backward right wing America has long had large numbers of
socialists and Labour Party and social democratic voting persons in its
armies. These armies, through the NATO alliance, defended Western Europe
against any threat of being over-run by Stalinist/Communist forces
alongside Americans.

But I am afraid as Kennedy said to Americans , to really understand the
situation one had to come to Berlin. There one saw the reality of the
Cold War.

If you prefer Fascism to Socialism then indeed you prefer the fascistic
heirarchys of Fundamentalism. This places you firmly on the side of the
structures that produce the likes of Al Queda and Saddam Hussein. You
support the political structures led by such as the Ayatollah Khomeini

As so often you demonstrate, all too often the enemies Americans should
most fear are themselves. It has all happened before - on the other side
of the Atlantic.

In a private conversation in November 1936 Cardinal Faulhaber of Munich
and Hitler spoke together for some three hours. The Cardinal himself
recorded Hitlers words and observed:

"The Fuehrer commands the diplomatic and social forms better than a born
sovereign... Without doubt the Chancellor lives in faith in God. He
recognises Christianity as the foundation of Western culture... Not as
clear is his conception of the Catholic Church as a God-established
institution"

Following their meeting Faulhaber issued an episcopal letter to be read in
Churches throughout Bavaria calling for co-operation between Church and
state "in combating communism" provided at the same time there was respect
for the Churches Rights as laid down in the Concordat.

Catholicism has a lot to answer for, for the definition of communism by
the Right Wing neo fascist Vatican and its Fascist leaning papacy and
Curia included many we would regard rather as socialists than communists

The Vatican came closer to its senses as the war itself came closer - but
much damage had been done, the opposition to Hitler and to Fascism had
been weakened in Central Europe as it had been in Spain

The true traitors in Western Society my dear, the ones who both invoke
terrorism and weaken the ability to fight it, are such as you, not "the
socialists" as you would have it

Think again. Our friends will continue to bleed , suffer and die until
you and your ilk come to their senses.



+++++++++++++++++++++

+++++++++++++++++
Scout Lady
2004-10-18 02:20:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by PharLap
I am actually quite stunned by Scout Lady's admission here in the last
line of this exchange - but first please read it.
Her actual words are "You ought to know by now that I support fascism over
socialism any day"
+++++++++++++++
That because it sailed right over your head PL.
Post by PharLap
Thinking about it I have come to amusing conclusion that when a
conservative
Christian makes a stand that it automatically means that the government
is
making that stand.
Does this mean that like the rest of the world you have recognised that
the current Administration seeks to be a Fascist theocracy?
You ought to know by now that I support fascism over socialism any day.
+++++++
Why is this such a serious matter? - well maybe we should see how our
forefathers saw the issue.
In Britain at the outbreak of the Second World War socialists in the
British Parliament and in the extra parliamentary membership of the Labour
Party all agreed to support a national government to conduct war agains
Nazi Germany, a fascist state.
It was as a direct result of this support that working class persons were
successfully encouraged to volunteer for the armed forces opposing Adolf
Hitler and allowed themselves to be conscripted. This then was the force
that opposed Hitler. Britain itself stood alone for some two years until
the Pearl Harbour bombing shocked America into an understanding of reality
- one wonders what it would take now, for even the vile incident of the
twin towers has failed to knock sense into some very silly heads over
there. (In fact one should remind you that the British Governemnt that
supports America in Iraq IS a Labour Government formed from a social
democratic and partially socialist party!)
In the years prior to 1939 almost the only opponents - with the exception
of the arch conservative Churchill - of fascism and its extremist form of
Nazism, were the socialists and communists. Had the line been held in
Republican Spain, it is very possible the war would never have taken
place.
Back in England my own parents lived close to one of the markets where
there were frequent street fights between socialists and fascists. It was
the socialists that rid Britain of the Fascist and Nazi menace in its
midst. Conservatism might well have smiled approvingly on the foundation
of a British Fascist state allied to Hitler for the British Fascist leader
- Moseley - was a former Conservative Member of Parliament, and there were
many Nazi sympathisers in the British Upper Class and his former party.
The most terrifying losses in the Second World War were in the communist
State of the Soviet Union - it took the sacrifice there of up to what is
now admitted to be around fifty million people, to stem the tide and to
start the defeat of Hitler. Most were socialists
Hitler's Fascism was halted at Stalingrad in the Soviet Union and at El
Alamein in north Africa. Had it not been for the working class kids in
Montgomerys eighth Army the tide might never have turned.
Americas allies in the Second World War were predominantly based firmly in
socialism at a grass roots level. As far as the conservative forces were
concerned, from Governments to the Vatican they collapsed one after
another and succumbed - often willingly - to the power of the jackboot.
The resistance of many countries and areas had a core of socialists and
social democrats - many, many, died. You insult their memory and through
them that of your forefathers who fought as allies.
Amongst the Eoropean Protestant churches, one after another caved in to
the Nazis, the German Protestants even allowing themselves to be organised
into a Germanic, pro Nazi Church. Priests like Bonhoeffer who stood
against the Nazis were a rarity indeed. Yes there were individuals of a
level of bravery that resulted in their even being listed amongst the
Righteous of the Nations, but sadly these were all too often exceptions
When you say you prefer Fascism to socialism, you insult those who fought
alongside American GIs in the war, and often in battles and wars since.
Western Europe as a continent with a far different political structure
and culture to backward right wing America has long had large numbers of
socialists and Labour Party and social democratic voting persons in its
armies. These armies, through the NATO alliance, defended Western Europe
against any threat of being over-run by Stalinist/Communist forces
alongside Americans.
But I am afraid as Kennedy said to Americans , to really understand the
situation one had to come to Berlin. There one saw the reality of the
Cold War.
If you prefer Fascism to Socialism then indeed you prefer the fascistic
heirarchys of Fundamentalism. This places you firmly on the side of the
structures that produce the likes of Al Queda and Saddam Hussein. You
support the political structures led by such as the Ayatollah Khomeini
As so often you demonstrate, all too often the enemies Americans should
most fear are themselves. It has all happened before - on the other side
of the Atlantic.
In a private conversation in November 1936 Cardinal Faulhaber of Munich
and Hitler spoke together for some three hours. The Cardinal himself
"The Fuehrer commands the diplomatic and social forms better than a born
sovereign... Without doubt the Chancellor lives in faith in God. He
recognises Christianity as the foundation of Western culture... Not as
clear is his conception of the Catholic Church as a God-established
institution"
Following their meeting Faulhaber issued an episcopal letter to be read in
Churches throughout Bavaria calling for co-operation between Church and
state "in combating communism" provided at the same time there was respect
for the Churches Rights as laid down in the Concordat.
Catholicism has a lot to answer for, for the definition of communism by
the Right Wing neo fascist Vatican and its Fascist leaning papacy and
Curia included many we would regard rather as socialists than communists
The Vatican came closer to its senses as the war itself came closer - but
much damage had been done, the opposition to Hitler and to Fascism had
been weakened in Central Europe as it had been in Spain
The true traitors in Western Society my dear, the ones who both invoke
terrorism and weaken the ability to fight it, are such as you, not "the
socialists" as you would have it
Think again. Our friends will continue to bleed , suffer and die until
you and your ilk come to their senses.
+++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++
PharLap
2004-10-20 12:10:49 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@uni-berlin.de>, "Scout Lady"
<***@nospam.net> wrote:
+
Post by Scout Lady
That because it sailed right over your head PL.
The plane that bombed my parents Baptist Church was piloted by an airman
sent by a Fascist Government - that of Nazi Germany - it was part of a
raid that deliberately bombed London Churches that night.

Nothing on this issue "went over" my family's heads then. In fact a few
hours earlier and both my parents and most of their Christian friends
would have been killed. Nothing about Fascism goes over my head now -
which is why I know Fundamentalism for the lying and filthy Fascism it is
- and recognise the remnants of the fascist filth in Catholicism left
there by a papacy and curia that disgraced Christ.

If you support this "over socialism" etc

Then you are the lowest form of ...............

And the Vatican versions of the "League of German Maidens" and the "Hitler
Jugend" have learnt nothing - even in their dotage

Do you raise your right arm when you bow to the altar

No pasaran!
Scout Lady
2004-10-20 15:19:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by PharLap
+
Post by Scout Lady
That because it sailed right over your head PL.
The plane that bombed my parents Baptist Church was piloted by an airman
sent by a Fascist Government - that of Nazi Germany - it was part of a
raid that deliberately bombed London Churches that night.
Nothing on this issue "went over" my family's heads then. In fact a few
hours earlier and both my parents and most of their Christian friends
would have been killed. Nothing about Fascism goes over my head now -
which is why I know Fundamentalism for the lying and filthy Fascism it is
- and recognise the remnants of the fascist filth in Catholicism left
there by a papacy and curia that disgraced Christ.
If you support this "over socialism" etc
Then you are the lowest form of ...............
And the Vatican versions of the "League of German Maidens" and the "Hitler
Jugend" have learnt nothing - even in their dotage
Do you raise your right arm when you bow to the altar
No pasaran!
Like I said, it sailed right over your head.

Loading...